Back to Writing An Argument for Phased Coding

An Argument for Phased Coding

Aug 22nd, 2023

As code-driven systems progressively become the backbone of modern-day solutions, the relevance and efficacy of software development cannot be overemphasized. However, given the multifaceted nature of software projects, a trend we as developers should be pushing on all companies, big and small, is for a phased approach to coding, separating development into two primary 'seasons' or phases: one for features and one for performance.

The separation into feature and performance phases allows developers to focus entirely on each aspect, promoting a deep dive into the specific areas. Concentrating on features first enables developers to experiment, innovate, and incorporate all necessary functionalities without concurrently worrying about optimization and performance. Similarly, a period devoted to performance increases the opportunity for refined optimization, resulting in better-performing applications. In short, most developers are more than capable of delivering features with excellent performance but can rarely do both optimally simultaneously. 

This modular approach also simplifies quality control, making identifying and troubleshooting bugs in isolated parts of the application easier. Being able to pinpoint issues related to either features or performance simplifies rectification processes and reduces the risk of overlapping issues or causing confusion regarding which team or developer is responsible. 

As mentioned, a phased approach allows for effective resource management and prioritization. It will enable the project management team to allocate resources appropriately in each phase, improving efficiency and productivity and even better knowledge sharing across the teams. Stakeholders can monitor the evolution of the project step-by-step, making the development process more transparent and understandable. 

User-centric designs are built on features that appeal to and satisfy user needs. Implementing a features-leaning phase ensures that stakeholder requirements are adequately addressed. Following this up with a phase concentrated on performance guarantees that the application is functional and efficient, establishing an ultimate win-win for end users and stakeholders alike. 

Teams can revel in completing one phase before moving on to the next, giving a sense of achievement and boosting morale. This also allows for recognition of individual contributions and team efforts, which are essential for overall team dynamics and motivation.

Despite its benefits, some argue that the phased approach might extend project timelines, but it's worth noting that adopting this method doesn't necessarily mean ignoring performance during the feature phase or vice versa. It's about making one the focus while the other takes a backseat. Adopting these phases or 'seasons' in coding brings about not only more structured workflows but also multifaceted improvements in various aspects of the software development process, such as focus, quality, efficiency, tracking, stakeholder satisfaction, and team morale. 

In the ever-evolving world of software development, new paradigms are always emerging, and while each project may call for a unique approach, separating development into a phase for features and a phase for performance fosters a balanced perspective that could drive your project to unprecedented success.